HEAD-TO-HEAD · FACTS ONLY
Bloom vs Zscaler: AI endpoint control facts side by side
Short answer
By The Device Desk · Endpoint AI Finder · Published 2026-10-11
Desk research from public vendor pages read on 27 September and 11 October 2026. Profiles follow our published method; we did not run the products.
Vendor pages read September and October 2026 · updated 2026-10-13
Where do their controls sit?
- Filled or hatched marker: Bloom
- Dashed teal ring: Zscaler, described
- DEV Filled marker: described on the product pages we read
- DEV Hatched marker: partly described (another component, a narrower scope, or method not detailed)
- DEV Dashed marker: not in our sources (it may exist; we did not find it)
What are the facts, side by side?
| Fact | Bloom | Zscaler |
|---|---|---|
| Owner | None | None |
| Positioning | An endpoint security company built around "Securing the AI-Native Endpoint": discovery of the software, extensions and AI tools running on devices, with policy enforcement across package and extension marketplaces. Offices in Wilmington, Delaware and Tel Aviv. | Zscaler's controls for employee use of generative AI: prompt-level visibility, allow or block by app, DLP blocking across GenAI apps, browser isolation that disables cut, paste and download, and data security for Microsoft Copilot. |
| How it reaches devices | Deployment method not published on the pages we read (re-checked 11 October 2026). Source: Bloom Security homepage · Read 27 Sep 2026 | Delivered with Zscaler's cloud security service in the network path; endpoint agents are not described on the page we read. Source: Zscaler: Secure the use of generative AI · Read 11 Oct 2026 |
| On-device controlDiffers | Partly describedDiscovers software, extensions and AI on the endpoint and automatically scales back overpermissioned MCP servers; how it reaches the device is not published. Source: Bloom Security homepage · Read 27 Sep 2026 | Not in our sourcesNot described on the pages we read. |
| Browser extension | Not in our sourcesNot described on the pages we read. | Not in our sourcesNot described on the pages we read. |
| Network or SSE proxyDiffers | Not in our sourcesNot described on the pages we read. | DescribedSee all input prompts users send to apps, allow or block apps, block sensitive data with DLP across GenAI, and isolate the browser to disable cut, paste and download. Source: Zscaler: Secure the use of generative AI · Read 11 Oct 2026 |
| AI or MCP gateway | Not in our sourcesNot described on the pages we read. | Not in our sourcesNot described on the pages we read. |
| Names the coding agents it covers | Not in our sources | Not in our sources |
| Decides on a tool call before it runsDiffers | PartlyAutomatically scales back overpermissioned MCP servers; decisions on individual calls are not described. Source: Bloom Security homepage · Read 27 Sep 2026 | Not in our sources |
| Controls what goes into browser AIDiffers | Not in our sources | MatchesPrompt-level visibility, DLP blocking across GenAI apps, and browser isolation that disables cut, paste and download. Source: Zscaler: Secure the use of generative AI · Read 11 Oct 2026 |
| Rolls out through EDR or device management you run | Not in our sources | Not in our sources |
| Can warn or ask instead of only blocking | Not in our sources | Not in our sources |
| Can block an agent, tool or actionDiffers | PartlyEnforces policies across npm, Chrome Web Store and Open VSX. Source: Bloom Security homepage · Read 27 Sep 2026 | MatchesAllow or block GenAI apps, and block sensitive data with DLP. Source: Zscaler: Secure the use of generative AI · Read 11 Oct 2026 |
| Has a watch-only or simulation mode | Not in our sources | Not in our sources |
| Records who or what took each action | Not in our sources | Not in our sources |
| Also covers SaaS, cloud or homegrown AIDiffers | Not in our sources | PartlyData security for Microsoft Copilot, including misconfigurations. Source: Zscaler: Secure the use of generative AI · Read 11 Oct 2026 |
| Has a public price or tiers (vendor site or marketplace) | Not in our sources | Not in our sources |
| Built into | None | None |
| Works with | None in our sources | None in our sources |
| Price | Not published. Source: Bloom Security homepage · Read 27 Sep 2026 | Not published (demo request). Source: Zscaler: Secure the use of generative AI · Read 11 Oct 2026 |
Where do they differ?
- On-device control: Bloom partly describes it; Zscaler is not in our sources.
- Network or SSE proxy: Bloom is not in our sources; Zscaler describes it.
- Decides on a tool call before it runs: Bloom partly matches; Zscaler is not in our sources.
- Controls what goes into browser AI: Bloom is not in our sources; Zscaler matches.
- Can block an agent, tool or action: Bloom partly matches; Zscaler matches.
- Also covers SaaS, cloud or homegrown AI: Bloom is not in our sources; Zscaler partly matches.
Choose Bloom if
- Your first worry is unvetted extensions and packages arriving on developer machines
- You want an inventory of everything on the endpoint before you write AI-specific rules
Choose Zscaler if
- You already route traffic through Zscaler and want GenAI controls there
- Your main risk is sensitive data pasted or uploaded into GenAI web apps
Which limits should you check?
Bloom
- Deployment method and pricing are not published.
- Decisions on individual tool calls and an activity record are not described on the pages we read.
- Limited company information on its own pages: they do not name investors; funding is known from press coverage (Ctech, 30 July 2026).
Zscaler
- Coding agents, MCP servers and local agent actions are not described on the page we read.
- Warn or ask responses are not described, and no pricing is published.