Skip to content
Endpoint AI Finder

HEAD-TO-HEAD · FACTS ONLY

Falcon Guardian vs Onyx: AI endpoint control facts side by side

Short answer

Falcon Guardian describes 1 of the four product control types on the pages we read and Onyx describes 3; they differ on browser extension and AI or MCP gateway. On decisions, Falcon Guardian decides on a tool call before it runs and Onyx decides on a tool call before it runs. We do not score either; the right choice depends on the AI tools people use, your devices, your current stack and whether you block or guide.

By The Device Desk · Endpoint AI Finder · Published 2026-10-11

Desk research from public vendor pages read on 27 September and 11 October 2026. Profiles follow our published method; we did not run the products.

Vendor pages read September and October 2026 · updated 2026-10-13

Where do their controls sit?

Falcon Guardian: described at 1 of 4 product control positions (on-device control), partly at 2 (browser extension, ai or mcp gateway).AI servicesMCP serversDEVOn-device controlBRWBrowser extensionNETNetwork or SSE proxyGWYAI or MCP gatewayPOLPolicy: no product
  • Filled or hatched marker: Falcon Guardian
  • Dashed teal ring: Onyx, described
  • DEV Filled marker: described on the product pages we read
  • DEV Hatched marker: partly described (another component, a narrower scope, or method not detailed)
  • DEV Dashed marker: not in our sources (it may exist; we did not find it)
The map shows where each product's own pages describe a control, or where your answers point. It is not a measure of how well a product works.

What are the facts, side by side?

CrowdStrike Falcon Guardian and Onyx Security, from each product's own pages. Differs is computed from recorded statuses, not wording.
FactFalcon GuardianOnyx
OwnerNoneNone
PositioningCrowdStrike's AI agent security product, described on 1 September 2026 as the evolution of Falcon AI Detection and Response (AIDR). It discovers shadow AI agents, connects agent activity to endpoint telemetry, governs which AI agents may run, protects prompts and sensitive data, and stops threats at runtime with containment, from endpoint to cloud and SaaS."The Secure AI Control Plane for the Agentic Era": inline inspection of prompts, tool calls and model responses across browser AI, coding assistants, desktop AI agents, cloud workloads and MCP servers. Based in Tel Aviv and New York.
How it reaches devicesThrough the Falcon sensor on supported Windows, macOS and Linux endpoints; Claude Code coverage is a JSON block in the Claude Code settings file with no agent to install, assigned through Falcon host groups.

Source: CrowdStrike blog: Copilot Studio agents and Claude Code, 30 July 2026 · Read 13 Oct 2026

Endpoint agents, browser extensions, APIs and gateways.

Source: Onyx Security: AI security platform · Read 27 Sep 2026

On-device controlDescribedDiscovers AI agents on supported endpoints and ties prompts, skills, tool calls, MCP servers and identity to what runs next; defines which agent types may run.

Source: CrowdStrike blog: Falcon Guardian, 1 September 2026 · Read 13 Oct 2026

DescribedEndpoint agents cover coding assistants and desktop AI agents.

Source: Onyx Security: AI security platform · Read 27 Sep 2026

Browser extensionDiffersPartly described(secondary: SACR) delivered also through browser extensions.

Source: SACR (secondary): CISO guide to endpoint control and prevention, July 2026 · Read 13 Oct 2026 · secondary source

DescribedBrowser extensions cover browser AI.

Source: Onyx Security: AI security platform · Read 27 Sep 2026

Network or SSE proxyNot in our sourcesNot described on the pages we read.Not in our sourcesNot described on the pages we read.
AI or MCP gatewayDiffersPartly describedThe AI gateway is listed as coming soon; SACR (secondary) also lists an MCP proxy.

Source: CrowdStrike: Falcon Guardian (formerly AIDR) · Read 13 Oct 2026

DescribedGateways and APIs inspect traffic inline.

Source: Onyx Security: AI security platform · Read 27 Sep 2026

Names the coding agents it coversPartlyNames Claude Code and Copilot Studio agents; Cursor, Codex and GitHub Copilot are not named on the pages we read.

Source: CrowdStrike blog: Copilot Studio agents and Claude Code, 30 July 2026 · Read 13 Oct 2026

PartlyCovers coding assistants; specific tools are not named on the pages we read.

Source: Onyx Security: AI security platform · Read 27 Sep 2026

Decides on a tool call before it runsMatchesChecks and blocks Claude Code prompts and tool activity as they happen, and returns allow or block before a Copilot Studio agent runs a tool.

Source: CrowdStrike blog: Copilot Studio agents and Claude Code, 30 July 2026 · Read 13 Oct 2026

MatchesInspects every prompt, tool call and model response inline.

Source: Onyx Security: AI security platform · Read 27 Sep 2026

Controls what goes into browser AIDiffersNot in our sourcesMatchesCan mask data in browser AI as well as block it.

Source: Onyx Security: AI security platform · Read 27 Sep 2026

Rolls out through EDR or device management you runDiffersMatchesThrough the Falcon sensor, if you run CrowdStrike Falcon.

Source: CrowdStrike blog: Falcon Guardian, 1 September 2026 · Read 13 Oct 2026

Not in our sources
Can warn or ask instead of only blockingDiffersNot in our sourcesMatchesFive actions: alert, block, mask, steer or ask.

Source: Onyx Security: AI security platform · Read 27 Sep 2026

Can block an agent, tool or actionMatchesAutomatic containment by blocking malicious agent behaviors.

Source: CrowdStrike blog: Falcon Guardian, 1 September 2026 · Read 13 Oct 2026

MatchesBlock is one of five actions.

Source: Onyx Security: AI security platform · Read 27 Sep 2026

Has a watch-only or simulation modeDiffersNot in our sourcesPartlyAlert is one of five actions; a simulation mode is not described.

Source: Onyx Security: AI security platform · Read 27 Sep 2026

Records who or what took each actionDiffersMatchesClaude Code events tied to a session and user in Falcon Next-Gen SIEM.

Source: CrowdStrike blog: Copilot Studio agents and Claude Code, 30 July 2026 · Read 13 Oct 2026

PartlyIntegrates with Okta, Entra and Splunk; separating a person from an agent is not described.

Source: Onyx Security: AI security platform · Read 27 Sep 2026

Also covers SaaS, cloud or homegrown AIMatchesCovers agents from endpoint to cloud and SaaS, including Copilot Studio.

Source: CrowdStrike: Falcon Guardian (formerly AIDR) · Read 13 Oct 2026

MatchesCloud workloads and MCP servers as well as devices.

Source: Onyx Security: AI security platform · Read 27 Sep 2026

Has a public price or tiers (vendor site or marketplace)Not in our sourcesNot in our sources
Built intoPart of the CrowdStrike Falcon platform.

Source: CrowdStrike: Falcon Guardian (formerly AIDR) · Read 13 Oct 2026

None
Works withNone in our sourcesLists CrowdStrike among its integrations.

Source: Onyx Security: AI security platform · Read 27 Sep 2026

PriceNot published. CrowdStrike's pricing page lists Falcon Go, Pro and Enterprise bundles, none of which include Falcon Guardian.

Source: CrowdStrike: pricing · Read 13 Oct 2026

Not published.

Source: Onyx Security homepage · Read 27 Sep 2026

Where do they differ?

  • Browser extension: Falcon Guardian partly describes it; Onyx describes it.
  • AI or MCP gateway: Falcon Guardian partly describes it; Onyx describes it.
  • Controls what goes into browser AI: Falcon Guardian is not in our sources; Onyx matches.
  • Rolls out through EDR or device management you run: Falcon Guardian matches; Onyx is not in our sources.
  • Can warn or ask instead of only blocking: Falcon Guardian is not in our sources; Onyx matches.
  • Has a watch-only or simulation mode: Falcon Guardian is not in our sources; Onyx partly matches.
  • Records who or what took each action: Falcon Guardian matches; Onyx partly matches.

Choose Falcon Guardian if

  • You already run CrowdStrike Falcon and want AI agent controls in the same console
  • Your agents include Copilot Studio as well as Claude Code

Choose Onyx if

  • You want masking or steering rather than only allow or block
  • AI use spans the browser, desktop apps, coding tools and cloud workloads

Which limits should you check?

Falcon Guardian

  • Needs CrowdStrike Falcon for the device path.
  • Claude Code is the only coding agent named on the pages we read.
  • The AI gateway is listed as coming soon, and no price is published.

Onyx

  • Uses its own endpoint agents and browser extensions, so there is something new to roll out to devices.
  • No pricing published, and specific coding agents are not named on the pages we read.

Questions people ask

Is Falcon Guardian or Onyx better for AI endpoint control?

Neither is scored on this site. Falcon Guardian describes 1 of four product control types and Onyx 3 on the pages we read, and they differ on 7 recorded facts. Which fits depends on the AI tools people use, your devices, where the work happens and whether you block or guide; the finder checks those.

Which of the two decides on a tool call before it runs?

Falcon Guardian: Matches. Onyx: Matches. Warn or ask: Falcon Guardian Not in our sources, Onyx Matches.

Do Falcon Guardian or Onyx publish prices?

Falcon Guardian: Not published. CrowdStrike's pricing page lists Falcon Go, Pro and Enterprise bundles, none of which include Falcon Guardian. Onyx: Not published.