HEAD-TO-HEAD · FACTS ONLY
Onyx vs Pluto: AI endpoint control facts side by side
Short answer
By The Device Desk · Endpoint AI Finder · Published 2026-10-11
Desk research from public vendor pages read on 27 September and 11 October 2026. Profiles follow our published method; we did not run the products.
Vendor pages read September and October 2026 · updated 2026-10-13
Where do their controls sit?
- Filled or hatched marker: Onyx
- Dashed teal ring: Pluto, described
- DEV Filled marker: described on the product pages we read
- DEV Hatched marker: partly described (another component, a narrower scope, or method not detailed)
- DEV Dashed marker: not in our sources (it may exist; we did not find it)
What are the facts, side by side?
| Fact | Onyx | Pluto |
|---|---|---|
| Owner | None | None |
| Positioning | "The Secure AI Control Plane for the Agentic Era": inline inspection of prompts, tool calls and model responses across browser AI, coding assistants, desktop AI agents, cloud workloads and MCP servers. Based in Tel Aviv and New York. | "The first workspace security platform for the AI era": visibility, risk understanding and real-time guardrails for AI builders, developer tools and business workspaces. Founding team from Unit 8200, Microsoft and Palo Alto Networks; part of AWS, CrowdStrike and NVIDIA accelerators. Publishes research on Claude Code hooks, exposed MCP servers and Open VSX malware. |
| How it reaches devices | Endpoint agents, browser extensions, APIs and gateways. Source: Onyx Security: AI security platform · Read 27 Sep 2026 | (secondary: SACR) Agentless, through API integrations and existing CrowdStrike, Defender and MDM infrastructure. Pluto's own site has no product or documentation page describing rollout. Source: SACR (secondary): CISO guide to endpoint control and prevention, July 2026 · Read 13 Oct 2026 · secondary source |
| On-device controlDiffers | DescribedEndpoint agents cover coding assistants and desktop AI agents. Source: Onyx Security: AI security platform · Read 27 Sep 2026 | Partly described(secondary: SACR) inline hook configuration on coding agents for runtime observability and enforcement. Source: SACR (secondary): CISO guide to endpoint control and prevention, July 2026 · Read 13 Oct 2026 · secondary source |
| Browser extensionDiffers | DescribedBrowser extensions cover browser AI. Source: Onyx Security: AI security platform · Read 27 Sep 2026 | Not in our sourcesNot described on the pages we read. |
| Network or SSE proxy | Not in our sourcesNot described on the pages we read. | Not in our sourcesNot described on the pages we read. |
| AI or MCP gatewayDiffers | DescribedGateways and APIs inspect traffic inline. Source: Onyx Security: AI security platform · Read 27 Sep 2026 | Not in our sourcesNot described on the pages we read. |
| Names the coding agents it covers | PartlyCovers coding assistants; specific tools are not named on the pages we read. Source: Onyx Security: AI security platform · Read 27 Sep 2026 | PartlyPluto's research covers Claude Code; SACR (secondary) says it governs tools such as ChatGPT, Claude and Copilot. Source: SACR (secondary): CISO guide to endpoint control and prevention, July 2026 · Read 13 Oct 2026 · secondary source |
| Decides on a tool call before it runsDiffers | MatchesInspects every prompt, tool call and model response inline. Source: Onyx Security: AI security platform · Read 27 Sep 2026 | Partly(secondary: SACR) inline hooks on coding agents for runtime enforcement. Source: SACR (secondary): CISO guide to endpoint control and prevention, July 2026 · Read 13 Oct 2026 · secondary source |
| Controls what goes into browser AIDiffers | MatchesCan mask data in browser AI as well as block it. Source: Onyx Security: AI security platform · Read 27 Sep 2026 | Not in our sources |
| Rolls out through EDR or device management you runDiffers | Not in our sources | Partly(secondary: SACR) deploys through existing CrowdStrike, Defender and MDM infrastructure. Source: SACR (secondary): CISO guide to endpoint control and prevention, July 2026 · Read 13 Oct 2026 · secondary source |
| Can warn or ask instead of only blockingDiffers | MatchesFive actions: alert, block, mask, steer or ask. Source: Onyx Security: AI security platform · Read 27 Sep 2026 | Not in our sources |
| Can block an agent, tool or actionDiffers | MatchesBlock is one of five actions. Source: Onyx Security: AI security platform · Read 27 Sep 2026 | Not in our sources |
| Has a watch-only or simulation modeDiffers | PartlyAlert is one of five actions; a simulation mode is not described. Source: Onyx Security: AI security platform · Read 27 Sep 2026 | Not in our sources |
| Records who or what took each actionDiffers | PartlyIntegrates with Okta, Entra and Splunk; separating a person from an agent is not described. Source: Onyx Security: AI security platform · Read 27 Sep 2026 | Not in our sources |
| Also covers SaaS, cloud or homegrown AIDiffers | MatchesCloud workloads and MCP servers as well as devices. Source: Onyx Security: AI security platform · Read 27 Sep 2026 | Not in our sources |
| Has a public price or tiers (vendor site or marketplace) | Not in our sources | Not in our sources |
| Built into | None | None |
| Works with | Lists CrowdStrike among its integrations. Source: Onyx Security: AI security platform · Read 27 Sep 2026 | (secondary: SACR) deploys through existing CrowdStrike, Defender and MDM infrastructure. (secondary: SACR) deploys through existing CrowdStrike, Defender and MDM infrastructure. Source: SACR (secondary): CISO guide to endpoint control and prevention, July 2026 · Read 13 Oct 2026 · secondary source |
| Price | Not published. Source: Onyx Security homepage · Read 27 Sep 2026 | Not published (demo request). Source: Pluto Security homepage · Read 13 Oct 2026 |
Where do they differ?
- On-device control: Onyx describes it; Pluto partly describes it.
- Browser extension: Onyx describes it; Pluto is not in our sources.
- AI or MCP gateway: Onyx describes it; Pluto is not in our sources.
- Decides on a tool call before it runs: Onyx matches; Pluto partly matches.
- Controls what goes into browser AI: Onyx matches; Pluto is not in our sources.
- Rolls out through EDR or device management you run: Onyx is not in our sources; Pluto partly matches.
- Can warn or ask instead of only blocking: Onyx matches; Pluto is not in our sources.
- Can block an agent, tool or action: Onyx matches; Pluto is not in our sources.
- Has a watch-only or simulation mode: Onyx partly matches; Pluto is not in our sources.
- Records who or what took each action: Onyx partly matches; Pluto is not in our sources.
- Also covers SaaS, cloud or homegrown AI: Onyx matches; Pluto is not in our sources.
Choose Onyx if
- You want masking or steering rather than only allow or block
- AI use spans the browser, desktop apps, coding tools and cloud workloads
Choose Pluto if
- You want guardrails on coding agents without a new endpoint agent
Which limits should you check?
Onyx
- Uses its own endpoint agents and browser extensions, so there is something new to roll out to devices.
- No pricing published, and specific coding agents are not named on the pages we read.
Pluto
- Pluto publishes little product detail on its own site, so this profile relies partly on a third-party report.
- No price is published.