Skip to content
Endpoint AI Finder

HEAD-TO-HEAD · FACTS ONLY

Onyx vs Sun: AI endpoint control facts side by side

Short answer

Onyx describes 3 of the four product control types on the pages we read and Sun describes 0; they differ on on-device control, browser extension and AI or MCP gateway. On decisions, Onyx decides on a tool call before it runs and Sun decides on a tool call before it runs. We do not score either; the right choice depends on the AI tools people use, your devices, your current stack and whether you block or guide.

By The Device Desk · Endpoint AI Finder · Published 2026-10-11

Desk research from public vendor pages read on 27 September and 11 October 2026. Profiles follow our published method; we did not run the products.

Vendor pages read September and October 2026 · updated 2026-10-13

Where do their controls sit?

Onyx: described at 3 of 4 product control positions (on-device control, browser extension, ai or mcp gateway).AI servicesMCP serversDEVOn-device controlBRWBrowser extensionNETNetwork or SSE proxyGWYAI or MCP gatewayPOLPolicy: no product
  • Filled or hatched marker: Onyx
  • Dashed teal ring: Sun, described
  • DEV Filled marker: described on the product pages we read
  • DEV Hatched marker: partly described (another component, a narrower scope, or method not detailed)
  • DEV Dashed marker: not in our sources (it may exist; we did not find it)
The map shows where each product's own pages describe a control, or where your answers point. It is not a measure of how well a product works.

What are the facts, side by side?

Onyx Security and Sun Security, from each product's own pages. Differs is computed from recorded statuses, not wording.
FactOnyxSun
OwnerNoneNone
Positioning"The Secure AI Control Plane for the Agentic Era": inline inspection of prompts, tool calls and model responses across browser AI, coding assistants, desktop AI agents, cloud workloads and MCP servers. Based in Tel Aviv and New York.AI agent security that says it sits in the path of every AI agent across workstations, cloud and SaaS, with three capabilities: discovery, posture management that learns each agent's purpose, and runtime checks of every tool call, connection and resource draw against that purpose before it executes.
How it reaches devicesEndpoint agents, browser extensions, APIs and gateways.

Source: Onyx Security: AI security platform · Read 27 Sep 2026

Not described; the site says you can get started in 5 minutes.

Source: Sun Security homepage · Read 13 Oct 2026

On-device controlDiffersDescribedEndpoint agents cover coding assistants and desktop AI agents.

Source: Onyx Security: AI security platform · Read 27 Sep 2026

Partly describedCovers agents on workstations; the on-device method is not described.

Source: Sun Security homepage · Read 13 Oct 2026

Browser extensionDiffersDescribedBrowser extensions cover browser AI.

Source: Onyx Security: AI security platform · Read 27 Sep 2026

Not in our sourcesNot described on the pages we read.
Network or SSE proxyNot in our sourcesNot described on the pages we read.Not in our sourcesNot described on the pages we read.
AI or MCP gatewayDiffersDescribedGateways and APIs inspect traffic inline.

Source: Onyx Security: AI security platform · Read 27 Sep 2026

Not in our sourcesNot described on the pages we read.
Names the coding agents it coversPartlyCovers coding assistants; specific tools are not named on the pages we read.

Source: Onyx Security: AI security platform · Read 27 Sep 2026

PartlyNames Cursor and Claude Cowork; Claude Code, Codex and GitHub Copilot are not named.

Source: Sun Security homepage · Read 13 Oct 2026

Decides on a tool call before it runsMatchesInspects every prompt, tool call and model response inline.

Source: Onyx Security: AI security platform · Read 27 Sep 2026

MatchesEvery tool call, connection and resource draw is checked against the agent's purpose before it executes.

Source: Sun Security homepage · Read 13 Oct 2026

Controls what goes into browser AIDiffersMatchesCan mask data in browser AI as well as block it.

Source: Onyx Security: AI security platform · Read 27 Sep 2026

Not in our sources
Rolls out through EDR or device management you runNot in our sourcesNot in our sources
Can warn or ask instead of only blockingDiffersMatchesFive actions: alert, block, mask, steer or ask.

Source: Onyx Security: AI security platform · Read 27 Sep 2026

Not in our sources
Can block an agent, tool or actionDiffersMatchesBlock is one of five actions.

Source: Onyx Security: AI security platform · Read 27 Sep 2026

PartlyIts demo shows a stopped action.

Source: Sun Security homepage · Read 13 Oct 2026

Has a watch-only or simulation modeDiffersPartlyAlert is one of five actions; a simulation mode is not described.

Source: Onyx Security: AI security platform · Read 27 Sep 2026

Not in our sources
Records who or what took each actionPartlyIntegrates with Okta, Entra and Splunk; separating a person from an agent is not described.

Source: Onyx Security: AI security platform · Read 27 Sep 2026

PartlyIts demo shows an action log.

Source: Sun Security homepage · Read 13 Oct 2026

Also covers SaaS, cloud or homegrown AIMatchesCloud workloads and MCP servers as well as devices.

Source: Onyx Security: AI security platform · Read 27 Sep 2026

MatchesNames Copilot Studio and AWS Bedrock agents.

Source: Sun Security homepage · Read 13 Oct 2026

Has a public price or tiers (vendor site or marketplace)Not in our sourcesNot in our sources
Built intoNoneNone
Works withLists CrowdStrike among its integrations.

Source: Onyx Security: AI security platform · Read 27 Sep 2026

None in our sources
PriceNot published.

Source: Onyx Security homepage · Read 27 Sep 2026

Not published (demo request).

Source: Sun Security homepage · Read 13 Oct 2026

Where do they differ?

  • On-device control: Onyx describes it; Sun partly describes it.
  • Browser extension: Onyx describes it; Sun is not in our sources.
  • AI or MCP gateway: Onyx describes it; Sun is not in our sources.
  • Controls what goes into browser AI: Onyx matches; Sun is not in our sources.
  • Can warn or ask instead of only blocking: Onyx matches; Sun is not in our sources.
  • Can block an agent, tool or action: Onyx matches; Sun partly matches.
  • Has a watch-only or simulation mode: Onyx partly matches; Sun is not in our sources.

Choose Onyx if

  • You want masking or steering rather than only allow or block
  • AI use spans the browser, desktop apps, coding tools and cloud workloads

Choose Sun if

  • You want each agent action checked against that agent's purpose

Which limits should you check?

Onyx

  • Uses its own endpoint agents and browser extensions, so there is something new to roll out to devices.
  • No pricing published, and specific coding agents are not named on the pages we read.

Sun

  • Sun's site is a single marketing page, so most details are not described.
  • How it reaches devices is not described, and no price is published.

Questions people ask

Is Onyx or Sun better for AI endpoint control?

Neither is scored on this site. Onyx describes 3 of four product control types and Sun 0 on the pages we read, and they differ on 7 recorded facts. Which fits depends on the AI tools people use, your devices, where the work happens and whether you block or guide; the finder checks those.

Which of the two decides on a tool call before it runs?

Onyx: Matches. Sun: Matches. Warn or ask: Onyx Matches, Sun Not in our sources.

Do Onyx or Sun publish prices?

Onyx: Not published. Sun: Not published (demo request).