Skip to content
Endpoint AI Finder

HEAD-TO-HEAD · FACTS ONLY

Prompt Security vs Sun: AI endpoint control facts side by side

Short answer

Prompt Security describes 2 of the four product control types on the pages we read and Sun describes 0; they differ on on-device control and browser extension. On decisions, Prompt Security does not describe tool-call decisions on the pages we read and Sun decides on a tool call before it runs. We do not score either; the right choice depends on the AI tools people use, your devices, your current stack and whether you block or guide.

By The Device Desk · Endpoint AI Finder · Published 2026-10-11

Desk research from public vendor pages read on 27 September and 11 October 2026. Profiles follow our published method; we did not run the products.

Vendor pages read September and October 2026 · updated 2026-10-13

Where do their controls sit?

Prompt Security: described at 2 of 4 product control positions (on-device control, browser extension).AI servicesMCP serversDEVOn-device controlBRWBrowser extensionNETNetwork or SSE proxyGWYAI or MCP gatewayPOLPolicy: no product
  • Filled or hatched marker: Prompt Security
  • Dashed teal ring: Sun, described
  • DEV Filled marker: described on the product pages we read
  • DEV Hatched marker: partly described (another component, a narrower scope, or method not detailed)
  • DEV Dashed marker: not in our sources (it may exist; we did not find it)
The map shows where each product's own pages describe a control, or where your answers point. It is not a measure of how well a product works.

What are the facts, side by side?

Prompt Security (SentinelOne) and Sun Security, from each product's own pages. Differs is computed from recorded statuses, not wording.
FactPrompt SecuritySun
OwnerSentinelOne (acquisition announced 5 August 2025; SentinelOne's blog of 3 September 2025 is titled SentinelOne Acquires Prompt Security)None
PositioningPrompt Security, now part of SentinelOne, inventories AI tools and code assistants, including unsanctioned shadow AI, through two local sensors, a browser extension and a dedicated AI endpoint agent, and is built into the SentinelOne Singularity Platform.AI agent security that says it sits in the path of every AI agent across workstations, cloud and SaaS, with three capabilities: discovery, posture management that learns each agent's purpose, and runtime checks of every tool call, connection and resource draw against that purpose before it executes.
How it reaches devicesTwo local sensors: a browser extension and a dedicated AI endpoint agent, managed from the SentinelOne Singularity Platform. Prompt Security argues that MDM or EDR integrations, which mostly run scripts periodically, are not enough.

Source: Prompt Security blog: browser and endpoint sensors · Read 11 Oct 2026

Not described; the site says you can get started in 5 minutes.

Source: Sun Security homepage · Read 13 Oct 2026

On-device controlDiffersDescribedA dedicated AI endpoint agent detects new AI agents, skills and connectors and applies runtime policies; it names GitHub Copilot, Cursor and Claude Code among the code assistants it inventories.

Source: Prompt Security blog: browser and endpoint sensors · Read 11 Oct 2026

Partly describedCovers agents on workstations; the on-device method is not described.

Source: Sun Security homepage · Read 13 Oct 2026

Browser extensionDiffersDescribedA browser extension inspects prompts, redacts sensitive data and discovers shadow AI.

Source: Prompt Security blog: browser and endpoint sensors · Read 11 Oct 2026

Not in our sourcesNot described on the pages we read.
Network or SSE proxyNot in our sourcesNot described on the pages we read.Not in our sourcesNot described on the pages we read.
AI or MCP gatewayNot in our sourcesNot described on the pages we read.Not in our sourcesNot described on the pages we read.
Names the coding agents it coversDiffersMatchesNames GitHub Copilot, Cursor and Claude Code.

Source: SentinelOne: Prompt Security · Read 27 Sep 2026

PartlyNames Cursor and Claude Cowork; Claude Code, Codex and GitHub Copilot are not named.

Source: Sun Security homepage · Read 13 Oct 2026

Decides on a tool call before it runsDiffersNot in our sourcesMatchesEvery tool call, connection and resource draw is checked against the agent's purpose before it executes.

Source: Sun Security homepage · Read 13 Oct 2026

Controls what goes into browser AIDiffersMatchesThe browser extension inspects prompts and redacts sensitive data.

Source: Prompt Security blog: browser and endpoint sensors · Read 11 Oct 2026

Not in our sources
Rolls out through EDR or device management you runDiffersPartlyIts own agent and extension, managed in the SentinelOne console; it does not ride on other EDR or MDM tools.

Source: Prompt Security blog: browser and endpoint sensors · Read 11 Oct 2026

Not in our sources
Can warn or ask instead of only blockingNot in our sourcesNot in our sources
Can block an agent, tool or actionDiffersNot in our sourcesPartlyIts demo shows a stopped action.

Source: Sun Security homepage · Read 13 Oct 2026

Has a watch-only or simulation modeNot in our sourcesNot in our sources
Records who or what took each actionDiffersNot in our sourcesPartlyIts demo shows an action log.

Source: Sun Security homepage · Read 13 Oct 2026

Also covers SaaS, cloud or homegrown AIMatchesCovers homegrown AI apps from testing to runtime.

Source: SentinelOne: Prompt Security · Read 27 Sep 2026

MatchesNames Copilot Studio and AWS Bedrock agents.

Source: Sun Security homepage · Read 13 Oct 2026

Has a public price or tiers (vendor site or marketplace)Not in our sourcesNot in our sources
Built intoBuilt into the SentinelOne Singularity Platform.

Source: SentinelOne: Prompt Security · Read 27 Sep 2026

None
Works withNone in our sourcesNone in our sources
PriceNot published.

Source: SentinelOne: Prompt Security · Read 27 Sep 2026

Not published (demo request).

Source: Sun Security homepage · Read 13 Oct 2026

Where do they differ?

  • On-device control: Prompt Security describes it; Sun partly describes it.
  • Browser extension: Prompt Security describes it; Sun is not in our sources.
  • Names the coding agents it covers: Prompt Security matches; Sun partly matches.
  • Decides on a tool call before it runs: Prompt Security is not in our sources; Sun matches.
  • Controls what goes into browser AI: Prompt Security matches; Sun is not in our sources.
  • Rolls out through EDR or device management you run: Prompt Security partly matches; Sun is not in our sources.
  • Can block an agent, tool or action: Prompt Security is not in our sources; Sun partly matches.
  • Records who or what took each action: Prompt Security is not in our sources; Sun partly matches.

Choose Prompt Security if

  • You already run SentinelOne Singularity
  • You need an inventory of AI tools and coding assistants first

Choose Sun if

  • You want each agent action checked against that agent's purpose

Which limits should you check?

Prompt Security

  • Two new local sensors to roll out, a browser extension and an endpoint agent, unless you already run SentinelOne.
  • Tool-call decisions, blocking, warning and activity records for agent actions are not described on the pages we read, and no pricing is published.

Sun

  • Sun's site is a single marketing page, so most details are not described.
  • How it reaches devices is not described, and no price is published.

Questions people ask

Is Prompt Security or Sun better for AI endpoint control?

Neither is scored on this site. Prompt Security describes 2 of four product control types and Sun 0 on the pages we read, and they differ on 8 recorded facts. Which fits depends on the AI tools people use, your devices, where the work happens and whether you block or guide; the finder checks those.

Which of the two decides on a tool call before it runs?

Prompt Security: Not in our sources. Sun: Matches. Warn or ask: Prompt Security Not in our sources, Sun Not in our sources.

Do Prompt Security or Sun publish prices?

Prompt Security: Not published. Sun: Not published (demo request).